Interesting take on the AI question, and perhaps capturing the nuance of what the other "models" of AI omit often - AI requires human inputs to grow, its own data is garbage that cannot be refined further for its own advancement. Perhaps the models we use lack something, perhaps the internal logic of AI wll only produce faulty material if given more of its own logic back, perhaps human creativity has something that AI is just incapable of replicating, or perhaps language models are limited by the language itself.
Could we see mediocre AI replace humans in mediocre jobs, forcing the rest of us to upskill so we can do the truly important jobs? Do we have enough of those for everyone to go around?
Interesting take on the AI question, and perhaps capturing the nuance of what the other "models" of AI omit often - AI requires human inputs to grow, its own data is garbage that cannot be refined further for its own advancement. Perhaps the models we use lack something, perhaps the internal logic of AI wll only produce faulty material if given more of its own logic back, perhaps human creativity has something that AI is just incapable of replicating, or perhaps language models are limited by the language itself.
Could we see mediocre AI replace humans in mediocre jobs, forcing the rest of us to upskill so we can do the truly important jobs? Do we have enough of those for everyone to go around?